According to Lent (2000), what place does animation occupy
in Asian societies? How different is this across Asia (ie comparing China and
Japan)?
According to Lents (2000) article “Animation in Asia:
appropriation, reinterpretation, and adoption or adaptation” animation plays in
an important part in Asian society, Animation plays a huge role both
economically and culturally. However, while animation is generally popular in
the Asian countries mentioned in Lents (2000) article there are major differences
in how each country has dealt and currently deals with the rise of animation.
Common Ground:
According to Lent (2000) although each different country has
their own history and rise to popularity in relation to animation, the one
factor they all seem to have in common is that they all seem to have hailed
from western animation. Because of this most early Asian animation were
influenced heavily by western animation especially Disney animation. This is
especially seen in the early Chinese created character of the smiling monkey
which was seen as a copy of the Disney character Mickey Mouse and also in
Indian animation “The Pea brothers” which also heavily drew on Disney
animation style (Lent, 2000). However, drawing on western style especially
those of Disney was generally looked favourably upon as Lent (2000) states “pioneer
animators such as James Wang of Taiwan, Payut Ngaokrachang of Thailand, Tezuka
of Japan, and Shin Dong Hun of Korea proudly accepted the title "the
Disney" of their respective countries, handed out by journalists and
adoring fans”.

Animation in China:
The Han brothers are originally believed to have brought
animation to China in 1923. Along with influences from western animation and
Disney they also drew inspiration from Chinese shadow puppet theatre and
Beijing Opera elements which continued to be used in Chinese animation. Lent
(2000) detailed that although China imitated American works they only used the elements
of foreign animation that fit their culture and never fully adopted foreign
animation. Lent (2000) compares this element of Chinese animation with other
countries. Stating that China achieved this better than other Asian countries
except maybe Japan. Chinese animation continued to evolve including more and
more indigenous stories as well as designing unique animation techniques such
as paper-cut, ink and wash (shuimo dong huapian), and folded paper.

Animation in India:
Animation in India was first seen during world war one. D.G.
Phalke known as "father of Indian cinema" produced animated shorts
when he could not acquire the funds to produce live action shows. Like China
and Japan, Indian animation drew on western themes and animation techniques.
However, Indian animation was not met upon as favourably as other Asian counterparts
as seen in a quote by Bendazzi (as cited in Lent, 2000) that Indian Animation
always
“Betrays the ethnic heritage of local animators and almost always
borrows from Western productions. The few films referring to the extremely rich
figurative, pictorial and colourist tradition of the country can be counted on
the fingers of one hand and to quote a young Indian animator and journalist
(Kireet Khurana) - "Animation in India is still waiting for a
prince."
This links into Lents comments on how Chinese and Japanese animation
only takes elements of foreign animation that are relevant to their culture as
an example of what may happen if you borrow to much from a foreign source.
Although Indian animation was looked down upon it still had some animators who still
incorporated Indian themes those who “kept in touch with their own soil”. (Jayanti
Sen as cited in Lent, 2000).

Animation in Japan:
Japanese animation
is not discussed much in Lents article it is however mentioned in contrast to
other Asian countries. Lent (2000) suggests that Japanese animation has kept to
indigenous influences in their works even more so than China. Japanese
animation or anime as it is more commonly known as is very popular not only in
Japan and Asian countries but also globally. The popular television network Cartoon
Network is an example of this. Cartoon Network views both western and Japanese
animation and airs in many different countries e.g. United States, Singapore,
Australia and even here in New Zealand. However, the popularity of Anime has
not always been looked upon positively. In the Philippines residents complained
about Japanese robot anime fearing that it was "intended to facilitate
acceptance of Japanese war technology" (Constantino as cited in Lent, 2000).
There were also complaints about the violence and sexual content of anime that
led to bans of it being shown before midnight in Singapore. The most extreme
case of anime rejection was in Korea and Taiwan where for decades anime was
banned for fear of cultural imperialism.
References:
Lent, A. J. (2000). Animation
in Asia: appropriation, reinterpretation, and adoption or adaptation.
Retrieved October 1, 2012, from http://www.latrobe.edu.au/screeningthepast/firstrelease/fr1100/jlfr11c.htm
Hello Alex,
ReplyDeleteI really like how you have catagoried and how you have layed out your argument. It was easy to understand and read what you were trying to prove here. I agree with your points on asian animation being influenced by western animation such as disney. I also like how you have gave examples of animations in each cultures. I enjoyed reading your post.
I would like to add a comment on animation occupy in Korean society.
ReplyDeleteThey have banned Animation in the 1990's as the animation wasn't suit to children such as it too violent and sexually inappropriate.